Sudhir Shrivastava v. State Of Chhattisgarh
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
^ HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) CR.M.P. NO.<^U^ OF 2013 Ssn^te PETITIONER Sudhir Shrivastava son of .."G.-..)i<;..
Shrivastava, aged about z-iq yeais, ', ~ ^j^working as Patwari/ Patwari Halka ^y^ No.
23, Pendri/ Sindhi Colony, Rajnandgaon/ P.S.-Lalbag, Civil & Revenue (C.G.) District-Rajnandgaon ,-h,"'
VERSUS
RESPONDENT <"
State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Station House Officer, Police Station-Kotwali, DistrictRajnandgaon (C.G.) PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P.No.843of2013 Sudhir Shrivastava Petitioner l/ersus Respondent State of Chhattisgarh (Petition under Section 482 ofthe Cr.P.C.) Mr.Anoop Mazumdar, counsel for the petitioner. Mr.S.K.Mishra, Panel Lawyerforthe State.
(SB:
Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.)
ORDER
(20-12-2013)
1. By this petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. the petitioner has prayed for quashment of F.1.R. registered in Crime No.234/2013 at Police Station Kotwali, Distt.Rajnandgaon for the offence punishable under Section 420/34 of the IPC.
2. Learned Panel lawyer for the respondent/State submits that investigation is at closing stage and investigating agency may file closure report or charge-sheet.
3. Considering the aforesaid submission, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh if ; cause survives and so advised.
4. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge