High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3041/2015dismissed

Mohan Lal Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-08-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3041 of 2015 • Mohan Lal Yadav S/o Shri Botiram Yadav, Aged About 46 Years Upper Division Teacher Presently Working At Govt. Middle School Durpa, BlockBamhnidih, District Janjgir- Champa (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Education Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur , (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Collector District - Janjgir - Champa (Chhattisgarh)

3. District Education Officer District - Janjgir - Champa (Chhattisgarh)

4. Block Education Officer Block Bamhnidih, District- Janjgir - Champa (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Ashwani Shukla, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Shri PK Bhaduri, GA for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 20/08/2015

1. In this petition, the petitioner, who is working as Upper Division Teacher in the Janjgir-Champa District, has challenged the transfer order dated 20.07.2015, whereby he has been transfered from Government Middle School, Durpa, Block Bamhnidih, district Janjgir-Champa to Government Middle School, Bhilai, Block Baloda, district Janjgir-Champa on administrative grounds.

2. In view of the Clause 4 of the State Government's transfer policy dated 1-72015 for the year 2015-16, on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty

to pursue the representation.

3. The authority before whom the representation lies under clause 4 of the transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 shall take the decision in the matter at the earliest, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu