← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4874/2016dismissed

R. K. Dewangan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-09-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.4874 of 2016 R. K. Dewangan (Ravindra Kumar Dewangan) S/o Shri K. Dewangan Aged About 52 Years Assistant Grade Ill, Office Of Executive Engineer Public Works Department North Baster, Jagdalpur, Post, Thana & District Baster At Jagdalpur (Chhattisgarh).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

2. Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Baster Zone, Jagdalpur, District Baster (Chhattisgarh).

3. Shri Dilip Kumar Assistant Grade Ill Office Of Superintendent Engineer, Public Works Department, Baster Circle Jagdalpur, District Baster (Chhattisgarh). ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate For Respondent-State :

Mr. S.P. Kale, Dy. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.

Order on Board 19/09/2016 1.

Heard on admission.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Baster-Zone, Jagdalpur, does not have jurisdiction to modify the earlier order passed on 30.07.2016 by him because that order was passed only upon approval of the Minister whereas the modified order has been passed on 05.08.2016.

3.

Despite repeatedly asked, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not aggrieved by order dated 30.07.2016 (Annexure P/2) which was passed earlier.

4.

The second order passed on 05.08.2016 does not contain any modification of the order of petitioner in so far as his shifting from the office of Executive Engineer, North Baster Public Works Department Division No. 1 to Officer of Chief Engineer Baster Circle Public Works Department Jagdalpur. It appears that the modified order does not at all affect as far as the petitioner is concerned.

5.

It is also found that the petitioner has been only locally shifted and he is not being sent to any other station. The petition appears to be frivolous and is accordingly dismissed with the cost of Rs.500/-. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tiwari