Hari Prasad Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2139 of 2019 Hari Prasad Sahu S/o Late Bamhan Lal Sahu Aged About 58 Years R/o Behind Sahanai Garden, In Front Of Bhagwati Villa, Gol Chowk, Rohnipuram, Daganiya, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Livestock Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, P.S. Rakhi, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Veterinary Services Chhattisgarh, Indravati Bhavan, Block3, Ground Floor, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Joint Director Veterinary Services, District- Raipur Near Mandi Gate, Pandri Road, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Cattle Hospital Godhi Block-Arang, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Vivek Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For State :

Mr. Rahul Mishra, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 27/03/2019

1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is the nonconsideration of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Veterinary Field Officer. According to the petitioner, he is working as a Cattle Attendant and the next promotion post is the Assistant Veterinary Field Officer.

2. The respondents also had conducted a DPC for promotion to the post of Assistant Veterinary Field Officer and the employees junior to the petitioner have been promoted on the said posts, but the case of the petitioner could not be considered for want of certain records/ documents.

-23. According to the petitioner, subsequently he has obtained all the records and documents and respondent No.3 has also forwarded all those records to the respondent No.2 and in the light of the records, the case of the petitioner be also considered to be promoted along with the junior persons, who have been promoted earlier.

4. Given the nature of dispute, this Court is of the opinion that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending, rather ends of justice would serve if the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to take a decision on the claim of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Veterinary Field Officer from the post of Cattle Attendant.

5. Subject to verification of the entire facts and records, particularly so far as the entitlement of the petitioner is concerned in accordance with the Rules and Regulations and also taking note of the seniority of the petitioner, let the respondent No.2 take a decision on the claim of the petitioner preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

6. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved