← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/2519/2021allowed

Raju Manikpuri v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-04-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 2519 of 2021 1.

Raju Manikpuri S/o Jagmohan Manikpuri, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ward No. 08, Navagaon Near Ganesh Shankar Mandir, Police Station Kharora, District Raipur (C.G.). ---- Applicant

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station Kharora, District Raipur (C.G.).

---- Non-Applicant For Applicant : Ms. Smita Jha, Advocate.

For Non-Applicant/State : Mr. Vaibhav Singh, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Justice Shri Gautam Chourdiya Order on Board 05/04/2021 1) Heard on admission.

2) The application is admitted for hearing.

3) With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally. 4) The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 as he is in jail since 17/03/2021 in connection with Crime No. 112/2021 registered at Police Station Kharora, District Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of Chhattisgarh Excise Act.

5) Allegation against the applicant is that he was found in illegal possession of 18.90 bulk Ltrs. of country made liquor and cash of Rs. 1,000/-.

6) Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the crime in question. She further submits that the applicant has been arrested on 17/03/2021,

charge sheet has been filed and trial is likely to take some time for its disposal. Therefore, the applicant be released on bail by this Court.

7) On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application and submits that the applicant has as many as 04 criminal antecedents of the year 2013 under Section 36(C) of the Excise Act, 2019 under Section 294, 323, 34 of IPC, 2020 under Section 294, 323, 506 of IPC & 2018 under Section 107, 116(3) of Cr.P.C.

8) Having heard learned counsel for the parties, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the detention period of the applicant, and the fact that there is no apprehension of the applicant tampering with the evidence or absconding as admitted by both the counsel, and that conclusion of trial may take some time, the application is allowed. It is directed that in the event of the applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court, he shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- i.

he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court, ii.

he shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial, and iii.

he shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial. iv.

he shall not involve himself in any offence of similar nature in future.

-Sd/- (Gautam Chourdiya) Judge Chandrakant