Ramesh Kumar Rai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 2685 OF 2018

1. Ramesh Kumar Rai S/o Shri Ramashankar Rai, Aged About 42 Years Occupation Shiksha Karmi Grade-III Under The Government Multipurpose Higher Secondary School, Ambikapur, Dist. Surguja (CG)

2. Jayanta Kumar Sinha, S/o Shri Prabhakar Sinha, Aged About 58 Years Occupation Shiksha Karmi Grade - III Under The Government Boys, Hihger Secondary School, Manendragarh, District Korea Chhattisgarh.

3. Rajesh Kumar Ambust S/o Late N.P. Ambust, Aged About 51 Years Occupation Shiksha Karmi Grade III Under The Government Primary School Bapupara, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

4. Banshi Lal Verma, S/o Late Shri Nandlal, Aged About 54 Years Occupation Shiksha Karmi Grade III Under The Dr. P.Pu Bakshi, A.S. Multipurpose Higher Secondary School, Khairagarh, Dist. Surguja (CG) ... Petitioners versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Director, Public Instructions, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Prakash Tiwari, Advocate.

For Respondents :

Mr. Shashank Thakur, Government Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 05/04/2018 1.

Learned Counsels appearing for the Petitioner as well as by the State Government jointly submit that the facts of the instant case stands squarely covered by a decision of this Court in W.P.(S). No. 6976 of 2009 titled as 'Hitendra Tanna & Others v. State of Chhattisgarth & Another' decided on 3.1.2018.

2.

Given the submission by the learned State Counsel, the present writ petition also stands disposed of in similar terms as that of order dated 3.1.2018 passed in W.P.(S). No. 6976 of 2009 titled as 'Hitendra Tanna & Others v. State of Chhattisgarth & Another'.

3.

Respondent No.1 is directed to consider the case of the Petitioners for the post of Lecturer or in alternative on the post of Lab Assistant strictly in

accordance with law in the light of rules and regulations applicable, within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order after hearing all affected parties including the intervenors. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.

4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) /sharad/ Judge