High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2690/2018disposed off

Sunil Kumar Minj v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-03-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2690 of 2018

1. Sunil Kumar Minj S/o Camil Minj, Aged About 39 Years Working As Lecturer Panchayat, Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Bardar, Block Balrampur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.

2. Ravindra Kumar S/o Omprakash Thakur, Aged About 36 Years Working As Lecturer Panchayat, Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Pasda, Block Balrampur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Balrampur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.

4. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

... Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Harish Khuntiya, Advocate For State :

Mr. Dheeraj Wankhede, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 28/03/2018

1. The Petitioners are aggrieved by the action of the Respondents, whereby the increment granted to the Petitioners is being withdrawn on the ground that they have not passed B.Ed/D. Ed examination.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the issue with regard to withdrawal/non-grant of increment on the ground of having not passed B.Ed/D.Ed examination was examined by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle v. State of Chhattisgarh (WPS No.4271 of 2017 and batch of petitions, vide order dated 03.11.2017) and various directions have been issued for affording proper opportunity of hearing and then decide the matter.

3. Learned Counsel for the State submits that the Petitioners' claim would be examined after affording opportunity of hearing in terms of order dated 03.11.2017 passed in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra).

4. Considering the aforesaid submission, this petition is finally disposed of, with a direction to the Respondents for examination of Petitioners' claim in terms of order passed by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra) and take appropriate decision thereon.

5. The writ petition stands accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Ved Judge