High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2345/2019disposed off

Vinod Mishra v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-04-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2345 of 2019 Vinod Mishra S/o Shri Rohini Prasad Mishra Aged About 44 Years Occupation Service Posted As Forest Fuard, R/o Barfani Ashram, In Front Of P.T.S. Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Forest, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Chief Conservator Of Forest Durg Circle, Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

3. Office Of The Dfo Through The Dfo, Rajnandgaon, Forest Division Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nande, Advocate For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 05/04/2019

1. The limited prayer which the petitioner has made in the present writ petition is for consideration of the petitioner for promotion from the Post of Forest Guard to the Post of Forest Officer.

2. According to the petitioner, he fulfills all the eligibility criteria including passing of the departmental examination for the same. He submits that the petitioner has made a detailed representation to the authorities concerned but till date the same has not been decided.

3. Given the limited dispute that the petitioner has raised, this Court does not intend to keep the writ petition pending rather ends of

justice would meet if respondents No. 2 & 3 are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner so far as his claim for promotion is concerned subject to verification of the credentials, seniority, availability of vacancy and other eligibility criteria applicable as per the service rules.

4. Let this exercise be done within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5. Needless to mention that this Court has not expressed any opinion so far as the merits of the case is concerned.

6. The writ petition stands accordingly disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit