← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5304/2016disposed off

Nandkishor Sahu v. South Eastern Coalfields Ltd.

2016-10-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5304 of 2016 Nandkishor Sahu S/o Ramcharan Sahu @ Jitendra Kumar, Aged about 27 years, R/o Village-Bhilai Bazar, Post : Bhilai Bazar, Tah.: Katghora, Distt.Korba (CG) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Through the Chairman-cumManaging Director, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (CG)

2. Chief General Manager, South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Gavera Area, Korba, Distt.Korba (CG)

3. Staff Officer (Land Revenue) South South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Gavera Area, Korba, Distt.Korba (CG)

4. Collector, Korba, Distt.Korba (CG) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For Res.No.1 to 3 :

Mr.Shailendra Shukla, Advocate For Res.No.4 :

Ms Ashtha Shukla, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 18/10/2016 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the parties would submit that the matter is covered by the decision of this Court passed in WPS No.4982 of 2016 (Mukesh Kumar Patel vs. South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. and others), decided on 22.9.2016 by which in paragraph 4 and 5 this Court has held as under:- "4. In view of aforesaid submission and order passed by this Court on 23/07/2015 in Ku.Rattho Bai (supra), at this stage, it would be proper to dispose off this matter with a direction to respondent no.2 to examine the claim of the petitioners in the light of of order dated 23/07/2015 passed in the case of Ku.Rattho Bai (supra). If upon verification of

facts, the petitioners herein are found to be identically situated, their case shall also be considered for grant of employment as per the policy of rehabilitation.

5. Considering that the matter relates to rehabilitation policy of land oustees, respondent No.2 is expected to take decision on the claim of the respective petitioners within a period of 20 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."

2.

In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of paragraph 4 and 5 of the decision rendered by this Court in the case of Mukesh Kumar Patel (supra). No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge B/-