Dr. B.R. Nanda v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5234 of 2016 Dr. Pramod Mahajan S/o Late Shri J. L. Mahajan Aged About 57 Years R/o Dayalband, Bilaspur, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
Versus
Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
2. Commissioner, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, 3rd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
4. Joint Director, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
5. Civil Surgeon Cum Chief Hospital Superintendent, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh) WPS No. 5243 Of 2016 Dr. B.R. Nanda S/o Late Shri J. C. Nanda, Aged About 59 Years R/o Basera Colony, Bhartiya Nagar, Bilaspur, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh) Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
2. Commissioner, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, 3rd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
4. Joint Director, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
5. Civil Surgeon Cum Chief Hospital Superintendent, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
WPS No. 5239 Of 2016 Dr. Shankar Sharan Bajpai S/o Late Shri A.K. Bajpai, Aged About 63 Years R/o Ward No 01, Vikas Nagar, 27 Kholi, Bilaspur, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattsigarh
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Thorugh Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. Commissioner, Department Of Health And Family Welfare 3rd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. Director, Directorate Health Services, 3rd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
4. Joint Director, Bilaspur Divison, Bilaspur Division Distirct Bilaspur Chhattisarh
5. Civil Surgeon Cum Chief Hospital Superintendent, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh WPS No. 5245 Of 2016 Dr. B.R.Hotchandani S/o Late Shri Thakur Das Hotchandani, Aged About 59 Years R/o Behind Mission School, Rajendra Nagar, Bilaspur, Civil & Revenue District- Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh) Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
2. Commissioner, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, 3rd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
4. Joint Director, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
5. Civil Surgeon Cum Chief Hospital Superintendent, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
WPS No. 5257 Of 2016 Dr. Suresh Kumar Tiwari S/o Late Shri Satanand Tiwari Aged About 60 Years R/o E-04, Family Planning Centre, Seepat Road, Sarkanda Bilaspur, Civil & Revenue District-Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya-Raipur DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Commssioner, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, 3rd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District-Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Naya-Raipur, District-Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
4. Joint Director, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
5. Civil Surgeon Cum Chief Hospital Superintendent, Bilaspur, DistrictBilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Smt. Meena Shastri, Advocate.
For Respondents/State : Shri Garry Mukhopadhyaya, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 04/11/2016 (1) Since all the writ petitions involve common question of law and facts, they are being disposed of by this common order. (2) Learned counsel appearing for the respective petitioners would submit that the petitioners are entitled for grade pay of Rs.8,700/- since 8.6.2007 as fixed for Prawar Shreni Vetanman of the Medical Officer Service Cadre as provided in the order dated 01.04.2013 by the State Government but that has not been granted to the petitioners, for which,
they have already made representations but as the representations have not been decided and the benefits have not been given to the petitioners, the State Authorities may be directed to consider and decide the pending representation within the specific time frame. (2) Prayer appears to be fair & reasonable.
(3) Be that as it may, The State Government is directed to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 04.01.2016 expeditiously preferably within a period of 30 days from the production of certified copy of this order and take decision in that regard. The petitioners are also entitled to file additional representation to the State Government for redressal of their grievances within a period of two weeks from today. (4) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petitions stand finally disposed of.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-