← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3075/2017disposed off

Dr. Radheshyam Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-05-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 3075 of 2017 Dr. Radheshyam Patel, S/o Shri Pitamber Patel, Aged about 35 years, R/o Post Bonda, Via Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, Raipur (C.G.) 2.

Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Through Secretary, C.G. Public Service Commission, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 3.

University Grants Commission, through Secretary, University Grants Commission, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi ---- Respondents Writ Petition (S) No. 3095 of 2017 Dr. Dipti Verma, W/o Shri Kaushal Kishore Verma, Aged about 35 years, R/o H-II Rajdhani Vihar, Kachna Road, Saddu, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, Raipur (C.G.) 2.

Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Through Secretary, C.G. Public Service Commission, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 3.

University Grants Commission, through Secretary, University Grants Commission, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi ---- Respondents Writ Petition (S) No. 3102 of 2017 Dr. Tiharu Ram Baghel, S/o Shri Ramratan Baghel, Aged about 38 years, R/o Village Gukhera Block & Thana Arang, District Raipur (C.G.)

---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, Raipur (C.G.) 2.

Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Through Secretary, C.G. Public Service Commission, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 3.

University Grants Commission, through Secretary, University Grants Commission, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi ---- Respondents Writ Petition (S) No. 3169 of 2017 Dr. Akanksha Verma, W/o Shri Manish Verma, Aged about 39 years, R/o Laxmi Nayas Mandir, Polsay Para, Durg (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, Raipur (C.G.) 2.

Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Through Secretary, C.G. Public Service Commission, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 3.

University Grants Commission, through Secretary, University Grants Commission, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Shri Rajeev Bharat, Advocate For State : Shri D.R. Minj, Deputy Govt. Advocate.

For Respondent No. 2 : Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent No. 3 : Shri S.S. Rajput, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 08/05/2018

(1) Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that the issue raised in this batch of writ petition is squarely covered with the decision rendered by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. 3268 of 2017 (Smt. Jagriti Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connected matters, decided on 25.01.2018, therefore, this batch of writ petition may be disposed of in terms of paragraphs 11 and 12 of the aforesaid order, which read as under:- "11.

In view of the aforesaid discussion, this Court is of the opinion that respondent No. 2- Public Service Commission should be afforded an opportunity to consider the case of petitioners afresh whether they have requisite qualification of Ph.D. in accordance with Regulation, 2009 or not after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. 12.

Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioners will submit necessary certificates/documents that they are having Ph.D. degree in accordance with Regulations, 2009 within a period of 15 days from today before the Respondent No. 2, Public Service Commission and in turn, the respondent No. 2-PSC shall consider the same after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners within a period of further four weeks from the date of its receipt and to pass reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law." (2) In view of above, the writ petition stands disposed of in terms of paragraphs 11 & 12 of the decision rendered by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. 3268 of 2017 (Smt. Jagriti Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connected matters, decided on 25.01.2018.

(3) Certified copy, today.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-