Tarun Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1981 of 2020 • Tarun Kumar Sahu S/o Late Shri Ishwar Lal Sahu Aged About 44 Years Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Working At Government Primary School Neganar, District Baster, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Director Public Instruction Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Director Panchayat And Rural Development, Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. District Education Officer Bastar, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

5. Treasury Officer Treasury Account And Pension, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate For State :

Shri Jitendra Pali, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 01.06.2020 Heard.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner are entitled for Kramonnati as per circulars dated 19.04.1999, 28.04.2008, 03.10.2008 and 11.01.2010 after completion of 10 years of service. He submits that the issue involved in the present petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in the matter of R.S. Verma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others (W.P.(S) No.2805/2002 by judgment and order dated 29.08.2006. He further submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of State of Tripura and Others Vs. K.K. Roy (2004 SCW/1) and the order passed in R.S. Verma (supra) top which learned counsel for the respondent/State has no objection.

2. Accordingly, the liberty sought for by the petitioner are granted to make a representation before the concerned authority. It is expected from the competent authority subject to verification decide the representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible in an objective manner preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

3. In view of above, the petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Jyoti