Smt. Satrupa @ Rupabai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 2263 of 2018 Smt. Satrupa @ Rupabai W/o Shri Jagdish Kevat Aged About 40 Years R/o- Parsada Para, P.S. Bori, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Police Station, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : Mr. Prasoon Agrawal , Advocate.

For State : Mr. Satish Gupta, GA ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 04/05/2018 1.

The applicant has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 611/2017 registered at Police Station - Durg, District-Durg (CG) for alleged commission of offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of IPC.

2.

Case of the prosecution is that the applicant impersonated her mother in law and got the property sold.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated. He further submits that investigation is complete and charge sheet has been filed. It is further submitted that allegations of impersonation are highly doubtful. During the course of examination of witnesses, there is no clinching evidence that it is the applicant who had impersonated her mother in law and got her property sold. Therefore, at this stage, she may be granted bail.

4.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes bail application and submits that in the documents of sale, photo of the applicant has been annexed, therefore the case is made out that it is applicant who impersonated her mother in law to got the property sold. 5.

Considering that the applicant is a lady and investigation is complete and charge sheet has been filed and further taking into consideration the extent of the land involved in the present case, and till date charges have not been framed. The application is allowed. 6.

Accordingly, the application is allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- along with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. she shall appear before the Trial Court regularly on each and every date, unless exempted from appearance. Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit