Shirish Pathak And ANR. v. T.S. Singh Deo And ANR.

ONTEMPT cAsg {c1 No.

o"? L3 or go t PET!IIQNERS z 1.

Shirish Pathak, S/a. Shri Prabhash , , i"

pathak, Aged About- 6 Years, 2.

Prabhash Pathak, 3/0. Shri Pandit Kanti /'Kumar Pathak, Aged Abaut- 43 Years, Gccupation- Occupation- JournaRst (Press I':

Reporter) ......... w\¢{« \W As the Petition-er No.

1 is a minor and is represented thmugh his naturai guardian (Father) Shri .Prabhash Fathak.

Beth the Petitioners are resident of Rohinipuram Gate, Behind Ayuwedic College, GYE. Road Raipur, Paste R. S.

University, RSI Saraswati Nagar, TehsilRainer, Revenue and CM! Distriet- Raipur {ea}.

RESPGNDENT$ :

{1) T.

S.

Singh Dee, President CONTEMNORS Managing Committee, Raj K'umar Coilege, GeEg Road Raipur, TensilRaipur, Revenue & Civil Districts Ralpur (C.G.).

V ,'

W.

~»\ "'5 Kw y'g'.._ N (2) 3ayant Bahadur Singh {J.B.S%ngh), / Pri-n'épai, Raj Kumar Callege, G.E. Road Raipur, Tehsiie 'Raipur, Revenue & Civit District Raipur (C.G.).

CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE g1§ OF THE gQN$TITULION OF IND;A READ WITH §§§TION 1.2 QF TH_E '3:

CDNTEMPT OF COURT ACT.

WW§WW kwm .ANJAY K AGRAWAL S B' HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S / 07.05.201 5 ed counsel for the petitioners.

Shri Surfaraj Khan, leam¢ '

Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Iea 'ned counsel for respondent No.1.

rned counsel for respondent No.2.

e'

Shri Ashutosh Ghade, l e parties submit that the order Learned counsel for t i with substantially.

d complained ofhas been compi made by learned counsel for the In view of the submissio is dismissed as having become parties, the contempt petition infructuous.

proceeding is dropped against e t Accordingly, the cont le issuedis discharged.

the respondents/contemnors.

Sdlganjay K. Agrawal '

'

Judge \