Antram Dixena v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5424 of 2016 • Antram Dixena S/o Shri Ram Prasad Daxena, Aged About 57 Years Presently Working As Incharge Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Pallari, Distirct Baloda Bazar Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhavan, Capital Complex, New Raipur, P.S. Rakhi, Distirct Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Department Of Urban Adminstraiton And Development, Indravati Bhavan, Capital Complex, New Raipur P.S. Rakhi, Ditirct Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Municipal Corporation, Korba Thorugh Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Korba Disitrict Korba Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate For State : Mr. R.K. Gupta, Dy. Advocate General For Corporation : Mr. Shivraj Singh, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 05/10/2016 Heard.

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue with regard to inclusion of the period of service rendered in SADA, Korba for the purposes of pensionary benefit has been considered by this Court in WP(S) No.4459 of 2014 (Narayan Prasad Dewangan Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and batch of petitions decided on 08.02.2016. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner's case is also squarely covered by the same judgment.

2.

Learned counsel for the Corporation does not dispute the legal position. 3.

In view of the above, the petition is also disposed off on similar terms and with a direction to grant the same benefit to the petitioner subject to verification of factual aspect.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Chandra