High Court Of ChhattisgarhWA/218/2018dismissed

Vrindavan Manjhi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-04-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 218 of 2018 Vrindavan Manjhi S/o Khadanga Manjhi, Aged About 72 Years R/o Ganesh Temple, Ward No. 14, Jamul Cement Works, Jamul, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh.

---- Appellant

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Labour Secretary And Labour Commissioner, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. President, State Industrial Court Of Chhattisgarh At Raipur, Mahanadi Khand, Near D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Pragatisheel Cement Shramik Sangh, Labour Camp, Jamul, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh.

4. General Manager (Now Vice President), The Associated Cement Companies Limited, Registered Under Indian Companies Act With The Registered Of Companies, Bombay, Registered Office At Cement House 121, Maharshi Karve Road, Mumbai - 20 Carrying On Manufacture Of Cement In The Name Of Jamul Cement Works At Jamul, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattigarh. Through Its Vice President I.M. Sharma.

---- Respondents _________________________________________________________ For Appellant :

Shri Puneet Ruparel, Advocate.

For State:

Shri Y.S. Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Pritinker Diwaker and Hon'ble Shri Sanjay Agrawal, JJ.

Order On Board 16/04/2018 Per Pritinker Diwaker, J.

1. Shri Puneet Ruparel, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that identical matter i.e Writ Appeal No. 98/2018 arising out of the same judgment has already been disposed of and therefore, the present appeal can also be disposed of in terms of the same order .

2. State counsel does not dispute the factual position.

3. We have perused the order dated 19.02.2018 passed by this Court in Writ Appeal No. 98/2018.

4. Considering the submission of the parties, the present appeal is disposed of in terms of the order dated 19.02.2018 passed by this Court in Writ Appeal No. 98/2018.

5. The petitioner/appellant, if so advised, may avail the remedy available to him under the law.

Sd/- Sd/- (Pritinker Diwaker) (Sanjay Agrawal) Judge Judge Yogesh/Nikita