High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/753/2015allowed

Rathulal v. Dhaniram Varman

2016-02-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 753 of 2015 • Rathulal S/o Salikram, Aged About 35 Years Occupation- Driver, R/o Churela, Police Station- Bilaigarh, District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh), Now District- Baloda Baza (Chhattisgarh), (Driver Of The Vehicle No. C. G. 04- J- 3542) • Yogesh Banjare, Aged About 45 Years R/o Kasdol, Police StationBilaigarh, District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh), Now District- Baloda Bazar (Chhattisgarh), (Owner Of The Vehicle No. C. G. 04- J- 3542). ---- Applicants

Versus

• Dhaniram Varman S/o Yadram, Aged About 36 Years Caste- Satnami, R/o Village- Parsada (Hasaud), Tahsil- Jaijaipur, District- JanjgirChampa (Chhattisgarh)...... (Claimant) • The New India Insurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office, Balauda Bazar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), (Now District- Balauda Bazar), (Insurer Of The Vehicle No. C. G. 04- J- 3542) ---- Respondents For Applicant : Shri Suresh Verma, Advocate.

For respondent No.1 : None present.

For Respondent No.2 : Shri Dashrath Gupta, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker Order On Board 29/02/2016 Heard on I.A. No. 01, application for condonation of delay in filing the present M.C.C.

This is not opposed by counsel for respondent No.2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The delay in filing the M.C.C. is condoned.

Also heard on M.C.C. No. 753/2015, application for restoration of M.A.C. No. 324/2010 which was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 26.04.2013 for want of prosecution.

This is also not opposed by the counsel for respondent No.2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and M.A.C. No. 324/2010 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge suguna