High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/320/2014dismissed

Manish Pathak v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2018-08-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 320 of 2014 Manish Pathak S/o Shri K.K.Pathak Aged About 39 Years R/o Behind Filter Plaint Post Khongapani, Ps Manendragarh, Civil And Revenue Distt Korea, C.G.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education, Department Of School Educaton/sarva Shiksha Ahiyan, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Ps New Raipur, Civil And Revenue Distt Raipur, Cg,

2. Mission Director State Project Officer, Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, C.G. Pension Bada, Ps Civil Lines, Civil And Revenue Distt Raipur, Cg

3. Director And District Mission Director Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission Serva Shiksha Abhiyan, Baikunthpur, Ps Civil Liens, Civil And Revenue Distt Korea, Cg, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh

4. Collector, Korea, Distt Korea, Ps Civil Lines, Civil And Revenue And Police Distt Korea, Cg, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh

5. Commissioner Surguja Division, Ambikapur, Ps Civil Lines, Civil And Revenue And Police Distt Surguja At Ambikapur, Cg, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

6. District Project Coordinator Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Manendragarh, Ps Civil Lines, Civil And Revwenue And Police Distt Korea, Cg, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh

7. Block Resource Coordinator, Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Manendragarh, Ps Civil Lines, Civil And Revenue And Police Distt Korea, Cg, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For the Petitioner : Ms. Rashul Bhavnani, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate For the State/Res. No. 1,4 & 5 : Ms. Sunita Jain, P.L. For the Res. No.2,3,6 & 7 : Shri B.L. Sahu, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta

Order On Board /08/2018

1. Counsel for the petitioner urged that by efflux of time this writ petition has become infructuous.

2. The writ petition is dismissed as it has become infructuous. Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Kamde