← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhREVP/71/2019dismissed

N.T.P.C.Limited v. Jiyalal Suryawanshi

2019-12-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy1 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVIEW PETITION NO. 71 OF 2019 1.

N.T.P.C. Limited, Through Its Chief Managing Director, Scope Complex, 7, Institutional Area, Lodhi Road, New Delhi- 110003. 2.

N.T.P.C. Limited, Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Post Sipat, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Pin Code- 495555 3.

Staff Officer (Land Revenue), N.T.P.C. Limited, Post Sipat, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. PIN Code 495555 4.

Assistant General Manager, Human Resource Department, N.T.P.C. Limited, Post Sipat, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur (CG) PIN Code 495555 ... Applicants versus 1.

Jiyalal Suryawanshi S/o Late Shri Hiraman Suryawanshi, Aged About 70 Years, Present Address: Village Bhilmi, Post- Daganiya-Khaira, P.S. Sipat, TahsilBilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2.

Sarnath Suryawanshi S/o Jiyalal Suryawanshi, Aged About 22 Years, Present Address: Village Bhilmi, Post- Daganiya-Khaira, P.S. Sipat, TahsilBilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 3.

Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG), PIN Code 495001 4.

Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur (CG) ... Respondents For Applicants :

Dr. N.K. Shukla, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. B.D. Guru, Adv.

For Respondents 1 & 2 :

Mr. Sangarsh Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondents 3 & 4 :

Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 02/12/2019 1.

The present review petition has been filed by the applicants/NTPC seeking review of the order dated 18.2.2019 passed by this Court in WPS No. 1053/2019. 2.

Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicants submits that after the order passed by this Court on 18.2.2019, the applicants/NTPC vide their order dated 1.3.2019 have decided the claim of the respondents/petitioners. 3.

In view of the fact that the applicants have since decided the claim of the respondents/petitioners by rejecting the same, this Court is of the view that the order passed by this Court on 18.2.2019 stands duly complied with. Once when the order has been complied with, the question of reviewing of the order does not arise at all. The review petition has in fact become infructuous at this stage. 4.

In view of above, the review petition is dismissed. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) /sharad/ JUDGE