Smt. Archana Gupta v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2724 of 2018

1. Smt. Archana Gupta W/o Shri Varun Kumar, Aged About 30 Years Presently Posted As Sub- Engineer, At Nagar Panchayat, Jarhi District Surajpur, R/o Behind Guru Dwara, Mayapur, Ambikapur, District Sarguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Urban Adminstration Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur , District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Directorate Of Urban Administration Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Joint Director, Urban Administration, Ambikapur, District Sarguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Municipal Officer Nagar Panchayat Jarhi District Sarguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

5. Vinit Jaiswal Sub Engineer Nagar Panchayat Pratappur District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents & WPS No. 2839 of 2018 Pramesh Kumar Dhruw S/o Shri Shivdayal Dhruw, Aged About 26 Years Working As Sub-Engineer, At Nagar Panchayat, Fingeshwar, Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband (Chhattisgarh) R/o Village And Post Chhura, Tahsil Chhura, District Gariyaband (Chhattisgarh), District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Directorate Of Urban Administration And Development, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Nagar Panchayat, Fingeshwar, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Fingeshwar, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents

Shri Mateen Siddiqui and Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri S. Majid Ali, counsel for respondent No.4 in WPS No. 2724 of 2018. Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 18/04/2018 Original records of transfer were produced and also have been perused by the Court.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are inclined to prefer representation to the authorities for consideration of cancellation / modification of transfer order. In view of above submission, these petitions are disposed off with liberty to the petitioners to file and pursue representations. If the representations are preferred, the authorities shall make all endeavor to decide the same within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of representation. It will be open for the petitioners to pray before the authorities for appropriate directions. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Deepti