← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2539/2021disposed off

Bipul Kumar Ray v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-06-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2539 of 2021 Bipul Kumar Ray S/o Late Anand Ray Aged About 59 Years Presently Working On The Post Headmaster At Middle School Jarhadih, Block Balrampur, District Balrampur - Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2.

Director Directorate Of Public Education, Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3.

The District Education Officer Balrampur, District Balrampur - Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.

4.

Block Education Officer Balrampur, District Balrampur - Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.

5.

Bhagwati Charan Vairagi Working On The Post Of Lecturer (L.B.) Government Higher School Jarhadih, Block Balrampur, District Balrampur - Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate For State :

Mr. Rahul Jha, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 17/06/2021 1.

The grievance of petitioner in the present writ petition is the appointment of respondent no.5 as Circle In-charge of Circle Resource Center, Middle School Jarhadih, Block Balrampur, District BalrampurRamanujganj. 2.

According to petitioner, he is much senior to respondent no.5 and therefore he should have been made Circle In-charge of Circle Resource Center, Middle School Jarhadih on account of his seniority.

According to petitioner, the appointment of respondent no.5, a person who is much junior to the petitioner, is contrary to the circular issued by the State Govt. on 04.08.2011 and 29.01.2020, both of which are still holding the filed.

3.

Given the said nature of dispute, let the petitioner make an appropriate detailed representation to the respondents 2 to 4 within a period of 2 weeks from today and the respondents 2 to 4 in turn shall consider the representation of petitioner within a further period of 45 days from the date of receipt of representation of petitioner. While deciding the same, the respondents 2 to 4 are expected to firstly consider the seniority of the petitioner and also verify the two circulars dated 04.08.2011 and 29.01.2020 issued by the respondent State so far as granting of charge is concerned.

4.

With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved