← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3284/2015dismissed

Smt. Usha Mahant v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-09-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3284 of 2015 • Smt. Usha Mahant D/o Haripad Mahant, Aged About 55 Years Working As Auxiliary Nurse-Cum- Midwife, Sub Health Centre, Mahrajganj, District Balrampur- Ramanujnagar, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Health Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Commissioner, Surguja Division, District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Collector, Balrampur- Ramanujganj, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Balrampur- Ramanujganj, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Shri Sangharsh Pandey, Dy. GA for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 09/09/2015

1. In this petition, the petitioner, who is working as Working As Auxiliary NurseCum- Midwife, Sub Health Centre, Mahrajganj, District BalrampurRamanujnagar, has challenged the transfer order dated 20.07.2015, whereby she has been transfered from Sub Health Centre, Mahrajganj, Balrampur to Sub-health Centre, Putsura, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj on administrative grounds.

2. In view of the Clause 4 of the State Government's transfer policy dated 1-72015 for the year 2015-16, on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty

to pursue the representation.

3. The authority before whom the representation lies under clause 4 of the transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 shall take the decision in the matter at the earliest, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu