← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/4730/2015allowed

Vinod Singh Rajput v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-09-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C.No.4730 of 2015 Vinod Singh Rajput S/o Late Pratap Singh Rajput, Aged about 23 years, R/o Gram Ward No.09, Ranisagar Para, Sakti, Thana & Tahsil : Sakti, Civil & Revenue Distt.: Janjgir-Champa (CG) ---Applicant

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh Through-Police Station, Sakti, Civil & Revenue Distt.: Janjgir-Champa (CG) ---Non-applicant For Applicant :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For Non-applicant :

Mr. S.R.J.Jaiwal, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 09/09/2015 1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.185/2015, registered at Police StationSakti, District-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 186, 353, 332 and 294 of the IPC.

2.

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the applicant made interference in the government function and used force to deter the public servant from discharging his duty and also caused simple hurt to him. 3.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant has not committed any offence and he has been falsely been implicated in crime in question as the said officer demanding Rs.500/- from the applicant, who has gone for making complaint. He would further submit that the applicant is in jail since 5.8.2015 and charge-sheet has already been filed and therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.

4.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would oppose the bail application.

5.

I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.

6.

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case; further taking into consideration the nature and gravity of offence; role of the present applicant, his pre-trial detention and the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed, this Court is of the opinion that present is a fit case, in which, the applicant should be enlarged on regular bail. 7.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed.

8.

It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed.s 9.

Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE B/-