High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1085/2012disposed off

Br.Chakradhari And ANR. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2018-07-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC NO.1085 of 2012

1. B.R. Chakradhari aged about 56 years S/o Uday Ram Chakradhari at present working as a Senior Accountant and Taxation Officer Janpad Panchayat-Pakhanjur, District-Kanker (CG)

2. Ram Kumar Netam aged about 46 years S/o Late Sampath Ram Netam at present working as a Technical Officer Janpad Panchayat Kanker, District-Kanker (CG) ----Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (CG)

2. The "Lokpal" Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, Kanker, District Kanker

3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat-Kanker, District Kanker

4. Gram Panchayat-Garhpichhwadi District-Kanker C.G.

5. Govind Kumar Dharra S/o Prabhuram Dharra aged about 40 years, R/o Village-Garhpichhwadi P.O.-Kanker, District-Kanker (CG) ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners :

Mr.Shobhit Koshta, Advocate For State :

Mr.Anand Dadariya,Dy.G.A.

For Respondent No.4 :

Mr.Umesh Verma, Advocate on behalf of Mr.Sumesh Bajaj, Advocate For Respondent No.5 :

Mr.R.N.Jha, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 16/07/2018

1. Learned counsel appearing for the parties would submit that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court passed in WPC No.1032 of 2012 (Shrimati Jaimila Markam and others v. State of Chhattisgarh and others) decided on 1st May, 2013 in which in para 6 and 7 it has been held as under:-

"6. In the event, review petitions are filed within a period of two weeks, no action shall be taken pursuant to the impugned order and the same shall not be given effect to, till final order is passed in review, in accordance with law.

7. This order is passed in the facts of the present cases. However, review in general may be maintainable only on the grounds stated in the memo dated 01.11.2012."

2. Accepting the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is disposed of in terms of para 6 and 7 of the order passed in Shrimati Jaimila Markam (supra). No cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K.Agrawal) Judge B/-