← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhREVP/38/2018disposed off

Mangal Singh Oyami v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-04-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR REVP No. 38 of 2018 Mangal Singh Oyami S/o Late Bhima Ram Oyami Aged About 38 Years Presently Working As Cleaner/driver Cum Watchmen At Veterinary Dispensary, Kodaripal, P.S. Chhingard, District Sukma, Chhattisgarh, District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh District Sukma, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Of Veterinary Services Chhattisgarh Capital Complex, Indravati Bhawan Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Deputy Director Veterinary Services Sukma, District Sukma, Chhattisgarh, District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh

4. The Collector Sukma District Sukma, Chhattisgarh, District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents 1.

For Petitioner :

Mr. A.K. Yadav, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Majid Ali, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 13/ 04/2018 Heard.

Upon due consideration, the order passed by this Court on 01.03.2018 in WPS No.1934 of 2018 is recalled and the Review Petition is disposed off with the following order :

1. The petitioner has filed this petition for issuance of direction to respondenttransferring authority to relieve him on the grievance that though the transfer order has been issued by the State Government, till date, he has not been relieved.

2. The issue regarding implementation of transfer order has been considered by this Court in the case of Ms. Manisha Agrawal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others, 2015(4) C.G.L.J.182, wherein relying upon several judgment of the Supreme Court, it has been held by this Court that once the employee has been transferred, it is required to be complied with unless it is modified, varied or

cancelled by the State Government itself.

3. Therefore, in these circumstances, this petition is disposed off with the direction that the petitioner shall be relieved forthwith by the controlling authority in compliance of order (Annexure P/1) unless the State has modified, varied or cancelled the impugned transfer order.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) J U D G E Rekha