Madhusudan Pratap Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3400 of 2021

1. Madhusudan Pratap Singh S/o Shri Hardayal Singh Aged About 44 Years R/o Post Office Dongri, Baloda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. State Government Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. State Government Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Finance Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. District Education Officer Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

5. The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

6. Joint Director Treasury Accounts And Pensions Bilaspur Division Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

7. Treasurer Treasury Janjgir Champa District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Anshuman Shrivastava, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Suyash Dhar, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 08.07.2021 .

1. The grievance of the petitioner is non granting of Kramonnati/time Bound Pay Scale on his completion of 10 years of service on the same post. The petitioner has relied upon the circular dated 02.11.2011.

2. The State Counsel, at the outset, makes a submission that the circular of 2011 has already been withdrawn by the Sate Govt. and the State has subsequently issued another circular dated 14.11.2014 in this regard.

-23. Given the aforesaid submissions made by the either side and taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner from the date of appointment i.e. 1998 till date has completed more than 20 years of service on the same post, let the petitioner make a suitable fresh representation to the respondent No. 5 and on receipt of said representation, the respondent No. 5 in turn shall take into consideration the prevalent circulars/orders of the State Govt. so far as grant of benefit of Kramonnati/Time Bound Pay Scale whichever is applicable and decide the representation as expeditiously as possible preferable within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation.

4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha