Smt. Kamlesh Devi v. South Eastern Coal Field Limited

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2001 of 2020 Smt. Kamlesh Devi D/o Late Shri Sunder Lal, W/o Shri Badelal Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village- Jeevanganj, Post- Kasiya, TehsilChail, District- Koshambi, Uttar Pradesh Presently Residing At Doman Hill Chirimiri, Post- Sonawani, Tehsil- Manendragarh, District- Koriya, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. South Eastern Coal Field Limited Through Chairman-Cum Managing Director, Head Office, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Revenue And Civil District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. Sourh Eastern Coal Field Limited Through Chief General Manager (Chirimiri Area), Malviya Nagar, West Chirimiri Police Station And Post- Podi, Tehsil- Baikunthpur, Revenue And Civil District- Koriya Chhattisgarh

3. Sub-Area Manager (N. C. P. H. Colliery Chirmiri Area), (S. E. C. L.) Chirimiri, District Koriya, Chhattisgsarh,

4. Personnel Manager, S. E. C. L. (N. C. P. H. Colliery Chirmiri Area), (S. E. C. L.) Chihrmiri, District Koriya, Chhattisgsarh

5. The Manager (Mines) N. C. P. H. Colliery Chirmiri Area, (S. E. C. L.) Chirimiri, District Koriya, Chhattisgsarh,

6. Maan Singh S/o Late Shri Kashi Prasad Aged About 55 Years Occupation Service, Posted As S. D. L. Operator At N. C. P. H. Colliery Haldibadi, Chirimiri, District Koriya, (C.G.) ---- Respondents For petitioner- Shri Surfaraj Khan, Advocate. For Respondent/S.E.C.L - Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 01/06/2020 Heard.

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner is that in place of father of the petitioner namely Sunder Lal respondent No.6 Maan Singh is working. Learned counsel submits that at this stage only limited grievance of the petitioner is that representation which has been filed by Annexure P-1 that may be directed to be decided.

2.

Shri Pankaj Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/S.E.C.L. would submit that they would decide the representation at its own merit.

3.

Considering the submission of both the Advocates, without any observation on the merits of the case, since only prayer have been made that representation of the petitioner may be directed to be decided which has been filed by the Annexure P-1, it is directed that respondents No.3 & 4 shall decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of this order.

4.

With such observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) JUDGE gouri