← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCR/75/2017dismissed

B. G. R. Energy System Limited v. Vandana Rolling Mills Limited

2018-09-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CIVIL REVISION No. 75 of 2017

1. B.G.R. Energy System Limited, 443, Anna Salai, Tenampet, Chennai (T.N.)- 600018, through Mrs. Prashanti Prasad, W/o Shri H. Prasad, aged about 52 years, Working as Assistant Vice President (Legal) at B.G.R. Energy System Ltd. 443, Anna Salai, Tenampet, Chennai (T.N.) - 600018

2. Shashikala Raghupathi, Chairman, B.G.R. Energy System Limited, 443, Anna Salai, Tenampet, Chennai (T.N.)- 600018

3. V.R. Mahadevan, Joint Managing Director, B.G.R. Energy System Limited, 443, Anna Salai, Tenampet, Chennai (T.N.)- 600018

4. A. Swaminathan, Joint Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, B.G.R. Energy System Limited, 443, Anna Salai, Tenampet, Chennai (T.N.)- 600018

5. Swarnmugi Kartik, Director Corporate Strategy, B.G.R. Energy System Limited, 443, Anna Salai, Tenampet, Chennai (T.N.)- 600018

6. S. R. Tagat, Director, B.G.R. Energy System Limited, 443, Anna Salai, Tenampet, Chennai (T.N.)- 600018

7. S. A. Bohra, Director, B.G.R. Energy System Limited, 443, Anna Salai, Tenampet, Chennai (T.N.)- 600018

8. M. Gopalkrishna, Director, B.G.R. Energy System Limited, 443, Anna Salai, Tenampet, Chennai (T.N.)- 600018

9. M.S. Sunderarajan, Director, B.G.R. Energy System Limited, 443, Anna Salai, Tenampet, Chennai (T.N.)- 600018

10. Janana Rajshekharan, Director, B.G.R. Energy System Limited, 443, Anna Salai, Tenampet, Chennai (T.N.)- 600018

11. Hendrich Bohmer, Director, B.G.R. Energy System Limited, 443, Anna Salai, Tenampet, Chennai (T.N.)- 600018 ---- Applicants (Defendants)

Versus

Vandana Rolling Mills Limited, through its Director - Subhash Agrawal, S/o Niranjanlal Agrawal, Vandana Building, M.G. Road, raipur, through Power of Attorney - Santosh Kumar Dubey, S/o Late Laxmishankar Dubey, address - Vandana Building, M.G. Road, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Non-applicant (Plaintiff) For Applicants :

Shri J. K. Gupta, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Order On Board 04/09/18 Heard.

1.

Mr. J. K. Gupta, learned counsel for the applicants submits that revision petition has become infructuous.

2.

Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka