← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2624/2017disposed off

Athnash Ekka v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-12-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy1 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2624 of 2017 Athnash Ekka S/o Late Marshel Ekka, Aged About 59 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Conservator Of Forest, Work Planning Division Durg Circke, District Durg Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Forest, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

2. The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Under Secretary, Department Of Forest, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Under Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For petitioner :

Shri Ishan Verma, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, Dy. GA Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 12/12/2018 1.

The challenge in the present writ petition is to the Annexure P-1 dated 19/05/2017 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred in the nature of deputation from post of Assistant Forest Conservator, Forest Department to the post of Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resource Department. The said order of deputation was without the consent of the petitioner. The petitioner submits that he had an interim order in his favour since 21/06/2017 and by virtue of the interim protection, he still continues to work in the Forest Department.

2.

Given the facts, by the efflux of time, the impugned order has lost its efficacy, the writ petition accordingly stands disposed off with the direction to the respondents not to act upon the impugned order any further so far as the petitioner is concerned, However, the right of the respondents stands reserved to pass a fresh order in case administrative exigency so arises. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Rohit JUDGE