Arun Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1971 of 2017 Arun Pandey, S/o Shri D. P. Pandey, aged about 43 years, R/o Opposite Family Planning Office, Nutan Chowk, Naya Sarkanda, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Collector, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

4. Nayab Tahsildar, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate.

For Respondent/State :

Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. A.G.

For Respondent No. 3 :

Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 26/03/18 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the title of the petitioner has been in dispute, therefore, he may be granted liberty to file civil suit.

2.

Per contra, learned State counsel would submit that petitioner is an encroacher on the government land and is therefore not entitled for the aforesaid liberty.

3.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 4.

Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the

jurisdictional Civil Court for redressal of his grievance and since the interim relief has been granted on 15.07.2017, it will be expedient to extend it for a further period of four weeks.

5.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka