← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2750/2018disposed off

Smt. Rajni S. Dewangan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-04-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2750 of 2018 Smt. Rajni S. Dewangan Shri Sanjay Dewangan Aged About 31 Years Occupation - Teacher Panchayat R/o Village Mangla Tahsil Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat, Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Directorate, Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

5. Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

6. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

7. Block Development Officer, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For petitioner :

Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate For State :

Mr. Majid Ali, Dy. GA ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 02/04/2018 Heard.

1.

The present is a case of transfer order which is under challenge

passed wayback in August, 2017, according to learned counsel for the petitioner the petitioner was on maternity leave from 07-08-2017 to 06-032018 and only when she submitted her joining, she was informed regarding transfer order.

2.

Transfer order was passed in the month of August, 2017 , therefore, I am not inclined to entertain the matter on this ground, however, the petitioner may prefer a representation on such grounds as may be available to her under the law including the grounds which have been raised in this petition and that be considered and decided by the respondents within four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Petition is accordingly disposed off.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit