Sushil Kumar Suryavanshi v. M/S India Bulls Financial Services Limited,

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP227 No.276 of 2018 Sushil Kumar Suryavanshi, son of Late Babu Lal Suryavanshi, aged about 45 years, R/o Juna Bilaspur, Krishna Nagar, Ward No.26, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. M/s. India Bulls Financial Services Limited, L-60, Malhotra Building Second Floor, Kanaught Place, New Delhi

2. Ajit Kumar Gupta son of Darash Ram Gupta, R/o. Ward No.60, Navadih Chowk, Gupta Cloth Store, P.S. 937, R-3-03/02, Seepat, District Bilaspur (CG) Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr.Rajeev Dubey, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 29.11.2018

1. By the impugned order, the petitioner's objection in execution of arbitration award has been rejected by the District Judge, Bilaspur, which has been questioned in this writ petition.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the impugned order passed by learned District Judge rejecting the petitioner's objection is unsustainable and bad in law.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order.

4. The petitioner, who is judgment-debtor/guarantor has raised the objection with regard to validity of arbitration award, which has been overruled by learned District Judge.

5. The petitioner, if aggrieved, the passing of arbitration award, he is at liberty to question the said award on permissible grounds under

Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as such, there is no illegality in the impugned order passed by learned District Judge rejecting the objection preferred by the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed subject to aforesaid liberty in favour of the petitioner. No cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge B/-