Aryan Securities Through Its Proprietor Asif Ahmed Khan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2719 of 2016 • Aryan Securities Through Its Proprietor Asif Ahmed Khan S/o Late Shri S.A. Khan, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Near Amardeep Talkies, Raipur, Distirct Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Thorugh The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration Mahanadi Mantralaya Naya Raipur, Post Office & Police Station Naya Raipur Distirct Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Municipal Corporation, Raipur Through The Commissioner, Municipal Corporaiton Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Zone Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Raipur Zone, 3, Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner :

Mr. B.D. Guru, Advocate For State / :

Mr. R.K. Gupta, Dy. Advocate General Respondent No.1 For Corporation / :

Mr. Satish Gupta, Advocate Respondents No. 2 to 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 04/11/2016 Heard.

1.

Grievance of the petitioner, as ventilated through this petition is that though the petitioner was engaged by respondents - Corporation to provide security services between the period from 01.07.2011 to 31.10.2012, but the payment in respect of said period has not been fully paid.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that till date, no dispute has been raised nor any claim has been rejected by the respondents - Corporation. It is submitted that the petitioner has made series of representations filed collectively as Annexure P-4 alongwith the petition, but till date neither payments have been cleared nor the claim has been rejected.

3.

It is a matter of dispute between individual and the Corporation, therefore, the Corporation is required to act fairly. Whatever is the

undisputed amount, is required to be paid at the earliest. Let the respondents- Corporation get the entire claim of the petitioner examined and decision be taken in the case of the petitioner within a period of 10 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4.

The amount which is found to be payable according to the scrutiny of respondents - Corporation shall be paid to the petitioner forthwith, not later than four weeks. However, if any claim of the petitioner is rejected, he shall be informed by a speaking order within that period of four weeks and thereafter, it will be open for the petitioner to take recourse to remedy as may be available to him under the law. 5.

With the aforesaid observations / directions, this petition is finally disposed off.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Chandra