← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPT/311/2017withdrawn

M/S Omprakash Trading Company v. Union Of India

2018-11-30Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (T) No. 323 of 2017 • Agrawal Trading Company, Power House, Bhilai (C.G.) Through - Its Partner - Anup Agrawal, S/o Late Pawan Agrawal ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Union of India Through Department of Central Revenue, Its Principal Director General of Central Tax at North Block, New Delhi.

2. The Chairman, GST Council, Govt. Of India, Tower - II, 5th Floor, Jeeran Bharati Building, New Delhi - 110001

3. The Central Board of Excise and Customs, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi.

---- Respondents with Writ Petition (T) No. 311 of 2017 • M/s Omprakash Trading Company Through Santosh Agrawal, S/o Late Thakursidas Agrawal, Opposite - Sapna Talkies Power House Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Union of India Ministry of Finance, Through Department of Central Revenue Its Principal Director General of Central Taxes at North Block, New Delhi.

2. The Chairman, GST Council, Government of India, Tower - II, 5th Floor, Jeevan Bharti Bulding, New Delhi - 110001

3. The Central Board of Excise and Customs, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance North Block, New Delhi.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Ashok Patil, Advocate.

For Respondent Nos.1 and 2 :

Shri B. Gopa Kumar, Assistant Solicitor General. For Respondent No.3 :

Shri Maneesh Sharma, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 30.11.2018 1.

Heard counsel for the Petitioner, learned Assistant Solicitor General for Union of India and counsel for Respondent No.3 / Revenue. 2.

I.A. No. 2 of 2018 is an application for withdrawal of the writ petitions. In view of the changed circumstances, counsel for the Petitioner seeks liberty of this Court to withdraw both the above writ applications. 3.

Learned Assistant Solicitor General representing Union of India has no objection.

4.

IA No. 2 of 2018 is allowed. The writ applications are dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge Brijmohan