Rajesh Jaiswal v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Misc. Criminal Case No.2364 of 2020 Rajesh Jaiswal, S/o Tejwali Jaiswal, aged about 29 years, R/o Pathrapali, Police Station Kotra Road, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.) (In Jail) ---- Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station Punjipathra, District Raigarh (C.G.) ---- Non-applicant For Applicant:
Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, Advocate.
For Non-applicant:
Mr. H.S. Ahluwalia, Deputy Advocate General.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 05/05/2020
1. Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the applicant, undertakes to comply the Chhattisgarh High Court Rules, 2007 as well as undertakes to file copy as required under the Guidelines for E-Mail Filing and Virtual Hearing During Lockdown Period.
2. With the consent of parties, the matter is heard finally.
3. The accused/applicant has moved this bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for releasing him on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No.79/2020, registered at Police Station Punjipathra, Distt. Raigarh, for the offence punishable under Sections 34(2) and 59 (a) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915.
4. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that 7 bulk liters of illicit liquor was seized by the police from the present applicant.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that this is the first bail application filed on behalf of the applicant for grant of regular bail, the applicant has not committed any offence, he has falsely been implicated in the case, he is in custody since 22-4-2020 and therefore,
he may be released on bail.
6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.
7. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
8. Taking into consideration the condition incorporated in Section 59-A(ii) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915, and bearing in mind the principles of law laid down in the matter of Banti Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh1, if the facts of the present case are examined, it is apparent that only 7 bulk liters of illicit liquor has been seized from the applicant which is more than the prescribed limit of 5 bulk liters, but looking to the fact that it is the first offence of the applicant and he is in custody from 22-4-2020, the case is triable by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, trial is likely to take some more time and further taking into account the nature and gravity of offence and the plea raised by the applicant that he has falsely been implicated in the case, I am of the opinion that present is a fit case in which the applicant should be enlarged on regular bail.
9. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the CrPC is allowed. It is directed that on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance as and when directed, the applicant shall be released on bail, subject to following conditions:
1. That, the applicant shall furnish a specific undertaking that while on bail, he will not commit any excise offence, otherwise bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled and shall cooperate the prosecution during trial.
2. That, the accused/applicant shall make himself available for interrogation before the concerned Investigating Officer as and when required and the accused/applicant shall not, directly or 2015(2) C.G.L.J. 341
indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.
3. That, the accused/applicant shall not act, in any manner, which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma