High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6179/2016dismissed

Ravi Lal Diwan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-11-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava1 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6179 of 2016 • Ravi Lal Diwan S/o Bodharam, Aged About 43 Years Assistant Teacher Panchayat Posted At Govt. Primary School, Gharghri, Block Lundra, Janpad Panchayat Lundra Distirct Surguja Chhattisgarh R/o Village Post Kundikala, Tahsil Lundra Distirct Surguja Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Thorugh The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Social Welfare Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, Distirct Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Chief Executive Officer. Jila Panchayat Surajpur, Distirct Surajpur Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer,, Jila Panchayat Surguja Distirct Surguja Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Lundra Surajpur, Distirct Surajpur Chhattisgarh

5. Additional Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Lundra, Distirct Surajpur Chhattisgarh

6. Distirct Education Officer, Ambikapur, Distirct Surguja Chhattisgarh

7. Block Educaiton Officer, Lundra Distirct Surguja Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :

Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For State :

Mr. D.R. Minj, Dy. Govt. Advocate on advance copy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 11/11/2016 1.

The petitioner has filed this petition challenging the legality and validity of transfer order dated 31.03.2016 and another order passed on 04.04.2016. 2.

Though number of grounds have been raised by the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid orders, but at this distance of time, when the petitioner did not take any steps for last 8 months, I am not inclined to interfere with the orders in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India because the order is merely an incident of service and does not affect any of the terms and conditions of the transfer policy. The petitioner may file appeal under the provisions of the C.G. Panchayat (Appeal & Revision) Rules, 1995, if he is aggrieved by the impugned order.

With this liberty, the petition is dismissed in limine. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Chandra