← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6197/2016dismissed

Devesh Kumar Gupta v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-11-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava1 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6197 of 2016 • Devesh Kumar Gupta S/o Awdhesh Kumar Gupta, Aged About 34 Years Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Posted At Govt. Primary School, Bathanpara Asandih, Block Lundra, Janpad Panchayat Lundra, District Surguja (Chhattisgarh), R/o Village & Post Batouli, Police Station Batouli, District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Social Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Surajpur, District Surajpur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayqat Surguja, District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Lundra, Surguja, District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Additional Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Lundra, District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)

6. District Education Officer, Ambikapur, District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)

7. Block Education Officer, Lundra, District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :

Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For State :

Mr. D.R. Minj, Dy. Govt. Advocate on advance copy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 11/11/2016 1.

The petitioner has filed this petition challenging the legality and validity of transfer order dated 31.03.2016 and another order passed on 04.04.2016. 2.

Though number of grounds have been raised by the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid orders, but at this distance of time, when the petitioner did not take any steps for last 8 months, I am not inclined to interfere with the orders in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India because the order is merely an incident of service and does not affect any of the terms and conditions of the transfer policy. The petitioner may file appeal under the provisions of the C.G. Panchayat (Appeal & Revision) Rules, 1995, if he is aggrieved by the impugned order.

3.

With this liberty, the petition is dismissed in limine. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Chandra