High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2832/2019disposed off

Smt.Indeshwari Banjare v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-04-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2832 of 2019

1. Smt. Indeshwari Banjare W/o Shri Durga Prasad Banjare Aged About 42 Years Occupation- Assistant Teacher(Lb), Govt. Pri. School, Balaudi, District- Balodabazar, R/o Ward-6, Stadium Parai, Nagar Panchayat, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. Pin- 493225 ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Director Through Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Indrawati Bhawan, D- Block, 4th Floor, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Secretary Through Department Of Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisagrh

4. The Director Through Department Of Public Instruction, Pension Bada, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. District Education Officer Through District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

6. The Chief Municipal Officer Through Nagar Panchayat, Pallari, DistrictBalodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Azad Siddiqui, Advocate For State :

Mr. Saleem Kazi, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board / 04 /201

1. The claim of the petitioner is that the petitioner is entitled for promotion from the promotion of Assistant Teacher (LB) to the post of Teacher

(LB) since the petitioners fulfills all the requisite eligibility criteria required for promotion to the post of Teacher (LB).

2. According to the petitioner, the department has not taken any steps for promotion. In case, for any reason, the department is not able to provide promotion to the petitioner, at least the petitioner's case be considered for grant of benefit of Kramonnati.

3. Given the nature of dispute that the petitioner has raised, let the petitioner make a suitable representation in this regard to the respondents No. 4 & 5, who in turn, shall consider the merit of the representation which the petitioner makes and decide as to whether the petitioner is entitled for promotion. If not, at least the petitioner is entitled for Kramonnati or not.

4. Let the respondents No. 4 & 5 take appropriate decision at the earliest preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of representation.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rahul