Harishchandra Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.2785 OF 2019

1. Harishchandra Sahu S/o Shri Khamanlal Sahu Aged About 33 Years Occupation- Assistant Teacher ( L B), Govt. Boys Primary School, Village Pallari, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara R/o Village Khatora, Post Jarve Tahsil And Police Station Pallari, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Director Department of Urban Administration and Development, Indravati Bhavan D - Block, 4th Floor, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. The Secretary Department Of Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

4. The Director Department Of Public Instruction, Pension Bada, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

5. District Education Officer District Balodabazar Bhatapara.

6. The Chief Munipal Officer Nagar Panchayat, Pallari, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

... Respondent(s) For Petitioner :

Shri Azad Siddique, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Shri Jitendra Pali,Dy. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 12.04.2019 1.

The claim of the petitioner is that the petitioner is entitled for promotion from the post of Assistant Teacher (LB) to the post of Teacher (LB) since the petitioner fulfills all the requisite eligibility criteria required for promotion to the post of Teacher (LB). 2.

According to the petitioner, the department has not taken any steps for promotion. In case, for any reason, the department is not able to provide promotion to the petitioner, at least the petitioner's case be considered for grant of benefit of Kramonnati. 3.

Given the nature of dispute that the petitioner has raised, let the petitioner make a suitable representation in this regard to the

respondents No.4&5, who in turn, shall consider the merits of the representation which the petitioner makes and decide as to whether the petitioner is entitled for promotion. If not, at least the petitioner is entitled for Kramonnati or not.

4.

Let the respondents No.4&5 take appropriate decision at the earliest preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of representation.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder