← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/98/2008non prosecution

Mahesh Nath Yogi And ORS. v. Shri N.K. Aswal And ORS.

2017-08-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Contempt Petition No. 98 of 2008 (Arising out of judgment/order dated ......... in Case No. ...... of the learned......)

1. Mahesh Nath Yogi, aged about 47 years, S/o Arjun Nath Yogi, Lower Division Clerk, Daily Wagers

2. Goverdhan Deshmukh, aged about 48 years, S/o Shri Kapil Deshmukh, Lower Division Clerk, Daily Wagers, Daily Wagers In Forest Department Of Government Of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District - Durg (C.G.)

3. Smt. Dulari W/o Shri Ram Krishna Chandrakar, Lower Division Clerk, Daily Wagers, Daily Wagers In Forest Department Of Government Of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District - Durg (C.G.)

4. Lalit Sharma S/o Shri Jhamu Prasad, Lower Division Clerk, Daily Wagers, Daily Wagers In Forest Department Of Government Of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District - Durg (C.G.)

5. Rakesh Sharma S/o Late Bali Prasad Sharma, Lower Division Clerk, Daily Wagers, Daily Wagers In Forest Department Of Government Of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District - Durg (C.G.)

6. Bhuwneshwar S/o Shri Punit Ram Sahu, Lower Division Clerk, Daily Wagers, Daily Wagers In Forest Department Of Government Of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District - Durg (C.G.)

7. Ganesh Ram S/o Late Bhondu Ram Dewangan, Lower Division Clerk, Daily Wagers, Daily Wagers In Forest Department Of Government Of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District - Durg (C.G.) ---- Appellants

Versus

1. Shri NK Aswal, Prinipal Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. pf Chhattisgarh, DKS Bhavan, Raipur (CG)

2. Shri Mahendra Singh Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax Office, Behind Raj Bhawan, District - Raipur (Cg)

3. Shri D. S. Mishra Finance Secretary, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, District - Raipur (C.G.) ------Respondents For Petitioners:

None.

For Respondents:

None.

Single Bench:Hon'ble Shri Sanjay Agrawal, J Order On Board

08.08.2017 1.

None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the Petitioners even when the case is called in the second round of hearing. 2.

In view of above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the Petition for want of prosecution.

3.

Accordingly, the instant Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Agrawal) JUDGE Priya