← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3570/2015disposed off

Smt. N. Qureshi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-01-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.3570 of 2015 Smt. N. Qureshi, W/o Shri Y.M. Qureshi, aged about 57 years, R/o Bungalow No.153, Sun-city, Lal Bag, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG). ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, thorugh the Secretary, Department of Women and Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur.

2.

Directorate of Women and Child Development, Government of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur.

3.

Collector, Bastar Jagdalpur, District Bastar. 4.

Collector, Sukma, District Sukma.

5.

Integrated Child Development Scheme Sector Tanhakvada, Block Chhindgarh, District Sukma (CG).

---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Jitendra Pali, Advocate.

For Respondents : Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 21/01/2016 (1) Heard.

(2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as Supervisor in the Department of Women and Child Development, Jagdalpur. By the impugned order dated 14.09.2015 passed by respondent No.3-Collector,

Bastar, whereby the petitioner has been attached at Integrated Child Development Scheme Darbha Sector Tanhakvada (Block Chhindgarh), District Sukma. He further submits that the Collector has no jurisdiction to transfer the petitioner outside the district and therefore, she may be permitted to make fresh representation before the State Government for redressal of her grievance. (3) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

(4) The petitioner is permitted to make fresh representation before the State Government. If such representation is made by the petitioner within ten days from today before the State Government and in turn, the said authority shall consider and decide the same on its own merit and in accordance with law preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioner.

(5) With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-