← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/894/2018disposed off

Jay Kumar Borkar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-04-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 894 of 2018

1. Jay Kumar Borkar S/o Mukunhd Rao Borkar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o House No. 62, Ward No. 16, Rajnandgaon, Civil And Revenue District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

2. Aarti Singh Koram, D/o Dharbharan Koram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o House No. 75, Ward Chhatarpur, Kalyanpur, Civil And Revenue District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. (At Present Residing With Her Husband At His Residential Address) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Director General Of Police, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. The Inspector General Of Police, Range, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

4. The Superintendent Of Police, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

5. The Superintendent Of Police, Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.

6. The Station House Officer, Police Station Ambagarh Chowki, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

7. Dharbharan Koram, R/o House No. 75, Ward Chhatarpur, Kalyanpur, Civil And Revenue District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Punit Ruparel, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 03/04/18 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that petitioners are major and married with their own sweet will and mutual consent but

respondent No. 7, who is father of petitioner No. 2 is harassing and threatening the petitioners, therefore, they may be provided police protection.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 3.

Be that as it may, the petitioners are at liberty to make an application before the Superintendent of Police, Rajnandgaon who shall take necessary steps to provide police protection to the petitioners, if they are entitled as per law.

4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka