Prof.Dr.S.C.Shrivastava v. K.D.P.Rao And ANR.

BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.I Contempt Petition (Civil) No.

f U /2008 Petitioner Prof. (Dr.) S.C. Shrivastava S/o. Shri Ram Pyarelal Shrivastava, aged about 68 years, Retired Professor (Economics) C.M.D.

College, ..•••••A'^-^ ^^^•-^^ ^w^..^^} Bilaspur (C.G.), R/o.

600/14, ~ Vinoba Nagar, Bilaspur at present ,i ..••""

R/o.

E-7 R.K.

Nagar, Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.)

Versus

Respondents K. D. P. Rao, S/o. Not known, Secretar/, State of Chhattisgarh, ~T Depart'ment of Higher Education, •J^ D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) K.D.P.

Rao, working as ^v> '^.^ Commissioner,' Wigher Education, State of Chhattisgarh, Govt, Science College Campus, Hostei No.4, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) ^'

. SECTION 11 OF THE .CONTEMPT OF COURT'S ACT, RTICLE-/'215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ,ON AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS FOR COMMITTING

iiBB a .

L 'v'

f ^.

^:

flY^ yft-^ '

^P-a^ ^.3 , ^^S! ^^3^ \w^ .?;s,?y»fS£:^""l~ Raipur t6.G. ~^"'~v-°t'y fo-^!^^ ^"'

>'4» KateaK'.tfi^ ua by

^•^.

.•<.

\$ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR '-<.

( Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, J ) Contempt Petition (civil) No. 111 of2008 Petitioner Prof (Dr) S.C. Shrivastava versus Respondents

1. K.D.P. Rao, s/o. Not known.

2. K.D.P.

Rao, working as Commissioner, Higher Education, State of CG.

ContemDtPetition^ No.108of2008 Petitioner Prof. (Dr) Prakasham versus

1. K.D.P. Rao s/o. K. Durgaih

2. Dr. Yugal Bharti Respondents Contempt Petition No.109of2008 Petjtioner Professor (Dr) Prabhakar versus Respondents

1. K.D.P. Ra'o s/o. K. Durgaiah.

2. Dr. Yugal Bharti.

3. Dr. Anjani Kumar Shukla Contempt Petition No.114of2008 Petitiener Prof (Dr) Pratap Kumar.

Versus

Respondents

1. K.D.P. Rao s/o. K. Durgaiah.

2. Dr. Yugal Bharti.

3. Dr. Anjani Kumar Shukla.

(Contempt Petitions underArticle 215 ofthe Constitution of India read with Section 12 ofthe Contempt ofCourtsActt

Present:

Mr. B.P. Gupta and Mr. Deepak Jain, counsel for the petitioners in all contempt petitions.

Mr. Abhishek Sinha, counsel for respondent No.1 K.D.P. Rao in att contempt petitions.

,.- -1--~' ^

Mr. Raja Sharma, counsel for respondent No.2/ Dr. Yugal Bharti in sA contempt petitions.

Mr. Ravish Verma, counsel for respondent No.3/Dr. A..K. Shukla in all contempt petitions.

Mr. Siddharth Rathore, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 13-3-2015)

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks to withdraw all the above mentioned contempt petitions with liberty to pursue the remedy civailable inthe writ petition which is pending for consideration. '?s-?!

:

2. Aecoraingly, all the above mentioned contempt petitions are disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Certified copy as per rules.

~-~---- Sd/- , saIyayK.Agrawal Raju \.- EI"~T®:

ii'~r"