High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2773/2018disposed off

Rakhi Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-04-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2773 of 2018 Rakhi Patel W/o Shri Khir Mohan Ratel Aged About 28 Years R/o Village And Post Nandeli Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mantralaya Capital Complex New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Additional Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mantralaya Capital Complex New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Engineer Chief Minister Rural Road Development Programme, Old District Panchayat Office Collectorate Office Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Superintendent Engineer , Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency Project Board , Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate For State :

Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer S.B. : Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 03/04/2018 Heard.

1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved on account of inevitable shifting of the petitioner to Bijapur on account of shifting of Project Implementation Unit-I Raigarh to Bijapur.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is a lady

-2employee and she was transferred to Raigarh only in the month of September 2017.

3. The petitioner has personal grievance which may not override the administrative exigency. Though this Court is not inclined to interfere with the project shifting from one place to other place, the petitioner's personal grievance may, nevertheless, be considered by the State as to whether it can be possible to adjust the petitioner at any other place than the core scheduled area where the entire establishment has been transferred in which the petitioner was working. Let the State decide petitioner's representation within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. For a period of 4 weeks, the petitioner shall not be compelled to proceed to Bijapur.

Sd/-/---- -- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Praveen