← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2774/2018allowed

Ram Singh Deewan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-04-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.2774 of 2018 Ram Singh Deewan S/o Veer Singh Deewan, Aged About 50 Years Presently Working As Head Master, Govt. Middle School, Pakrod, Block Kasdole, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. District Education Officer, Balodabazar, District Balodabazar, Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

3. Block Education Officer, Block Kasdole, District Balodabazar, Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For petitioner :

Shri CJK Rao, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 03/ 04/2018

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner stands squarely covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in case of Asha Saxenas Vs. State of MP & Ors. 2009 (3) MPJR (SC) 59.

2. The issue pertains to grant of two advance increments on successful completion of B.Ed. course before appointment on own expenses.

3. On verification, counsel for the State submits that the matter can be disposed of for consideration of the petitioner's case in the light of decision of the Supreme Court in case of Asha Saxena (Supra).

4. Given the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the counsel for either side, the present petition stands disposed of. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the

petitioner for grant of two advance increments as per circulars prevailing in the State Government after verification of the facts pleaded by the petitioner, and in case if it is found that the petitioner is similarly placed, appropriate benefit be provided to him forthwith. Let this exercise be done within a period of 90 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of. Sd/- (P.Sam Koshy) Judge inder