← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2287/2019disposed off

Shobha Ram Chandravanshi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-03-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2287 of 2019 Shobha Ram Chandravanshi S/o Shri R.K. Chandravanshi Aged About 44 Years Presently Working As Constable, Posted At Police Line, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Director General Of Police Police Head Quarter, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Superintendent Of Police Kabirdham, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate For State :

Mr. P. Acharya, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 29/03/2019 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled for Kramonnati as per circulars dated 19.04.1999, 28.04.2008, 03.10.2008 & 11.01.2010 after completion of 10 years of service. He submits that the issue involved in the present petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in the matter of R.S. Verma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others (W.P.(S) No.2805/2002 by judgment and order dated 29.08.2006. He further submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of State of Tripura and Others Vs. K.K. Roy (2004 SCW/1) and the order

-2passed in R.S. Verma (supra) top which learned counsel for the respondent/State has no objection.

2.

Accordingly, the liberty sought for by the petitioner is granted to make a representation before the concerned authority. It is expected from the competent authority to decide the representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible in an objective manner preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

3.

In view of above, the petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved