Jaba Herbals v. Union Of India
-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2948 of 2016 Jaba Herbals Through Smt. Ranjit Kaur Saluja, Aged 44 Years, W/o Baljeet Singh Saluja, Village Bandhi, Tahsil Pendra, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Secretary, Ministry Of Micro Small And Medium Enterprises, Udyog Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi 110001
2. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through General Manager, District Trade And Industries Centre, New Composite Building, Collectorate, Bilaspur, P.S. Civil Lines, Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
3. Chhattisgarh Power Distribution Company Ltd., Through Divisional Engineer, Pendra Road, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
4. Smt. Chitrangana Rahi, Aged About 30 Years Junior Engineer, Chhattisgarh Power Distribution Company Ltd, Pendra, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
5. State Bank Of India, Through Branch Manager, Pendra V B, Post Pendra, P.S. Pendra Road, Bilapsur, Revenue And Civil District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri Mukesh Sharma, Advocate For Respondent No.1 :
Shri Rajkumar Gupta, Advocate For Respondent No.2 :
Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate For Respondent No.3 :
Ms. Veena Nair, Advocate.
For Respondent No.5 :
Shri Utsav Mahiswar, Advocate S.B.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 11/05/2017
1. After hearing learned counsel appearing for the parties, there appears to be a very trivial dispute between the parties.
2. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 submits that the connection could not be established because the petitioner had to supply necessary cables to respondent No.3.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no specific information in this regard has been given to the petitioner.
-24. Learned counsel for the respondent No.3 specifically indicate the requirement of cable (nature, length and quality). The moment it is submitted by the petitioner, the respondents shall establish connection within 10 days.
5. As far as petitioner's claim of alleged loss is concerned, it will be open for the petitioner to file a suit seeking appropriate damages as the amount of compensation cannot be quantified in these proceedings.
6. The petition is accordingly finally disposed off. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Praveen