← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2492/2021disposed off

Basant Kumar Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-06-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2492 of 2021 Basant Kumar Yadav S/o Ramjanam Yadav, Aged About 54 Years Presently Working On The Post Headmaster At Middle School Jagima, Block Shankargarh District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2.

Director, Directorate Of Public Education, Indrawati Bhawan New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3.

The District Education Officer, Balrampur District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 4.

Block Education Officer, Shankargarh District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 5.

Kumilal Kerketta Working On The Post Of Lecturer (L.B.) Govt. High School Jagima Block Shankargarh, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate For State :

Mr. Rahul Jha, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 17/06/2021 1.

The grievance of petitioner in the present writ petition is the appointment of respondent no.5 as Circle In-charge of Circle Resource Center, Jagima, Block Shankargarh, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj. 2.

According to petitioner, he is much senior to respondent no.5 and therefore he should have been made Circle In-charge of Circle Resource Center, Jagima on account of his seniority. According to petitioner, the appointment of respondent no.5, a person who is much

junior to the petitioner, is contrary to the circular issued by the State Govt. on 04.08.2011 and 29.01.2020, both of which are still holding the filed.

3.

Given the said nature of dispute, let the petitioner make an appropriate detailed representation to the respondents 2 to 4 within a period of 2 weeks from today and the respondents 2 to 4 in turn shall consider the representation of petitioner within a further period of 45 days from the date of receipt of representation of petitioner. While deciding the same, the respondents 2 to 4 are expected to firstly consider the seniority of the petitioner and also verify the two circulars dated 04.08.2011 and 29.01.2020 issued by the respondent State so far as granting of charge is concerned.

4.

With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved