High Court Of ChhattisgarhWA/210/2019dismissed

Purushottam Lal Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-04-10Hon'Ble The Acting Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu2 pages

WA No. 210 of 2019 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 210 of 2019 • Purushottam Lal Sahu S/o Late Shri G.L. Sahu Aged About 49 Years Working As Assistant Grade III at Nagar Panchayat Sakri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Nagariya Administration & Development, Mantralaya Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Nagar Panchayat Sakri Through Chief Municipal Officer Sakri, Tahsil- Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Director Nagariya Administration And Development, Mantralaya Indrawati Bhawan Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Joint Director Nagariya Administration And Development, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

5. Chairman, District Selection Committee, Office Of Deputy Director, Bilaspur, Administration And Development, Bilaspur, Division, Distirct- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

6. Harish Shashti Posted Nagar Panchayat Sakri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :- Shri Akath Kumar Yadav, Advocate For Respondent-State :- Shri Faiz Kazi, PL for the State

WA No. 210 of 2019 Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag. CJ Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, J.

Judgment on Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag. CJ 10/04/2019

1. Challenging promotion of the respondent No.6 i.e. Harish Shashti from the post of Assistant Grade-III to the post of Assistant Grade-II, petitioner preferred the writ petition on submission that since he was working on daily wages in the Department from 1997 he was senior to the respondent No.6 who was directly recruited on 18.04.2013.

2. Petitioner being a daily wager having been regularized on 03.06.2016 cannot claim seniority over the private respondent, who was recruited much prior to the date of regularization of the petitioner. The writ petition has rightly been dismissed by the Single Bench, therefore, there is no substance in this writ appeal and accordingly the same is liable to be and is hereby dismissed.

Sd/- Sd/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Acting Chief Justice Judge Ankit