Krishna Pande v. State Of Chhattisgarh
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 5927 of 2015 Krishna Pande, S/o. Treta Prasad Pande, Aged About 25 Years, R/o. Bramhanpara, Ward No.23, Police Station, Tahsil Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh, Through - Station House Officer, Police Station - Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant :
Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate For Respondent :
Mr Vinod Tekam, Panel Lawyer --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 05/11/2015 1.
This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.240/2015 registered at Police Station- Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 457, 380/ 34 and 411 of Indian Penal Code.
2.
Case of the prosecution is that the complainant Mukesh Kumar lodged a report that on 22.07.2015 his mother Yogita Bai went for some treatment and after came back she found that the lock of the house was broken and from Almirah, two pairs of bangles and ring and Rs.10,000/- have been stolen. Thereafter, on investigation the applicant has been arrested.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that nothing has been seized from this applicant and he has only been inculpated on the basis of the memorandum of the co-accused. He further submits
that except the memorandum no evidence is available against this applicant and only on the basis of the memorandum of co-accused Ramu Tiwari and Rahul Adkane, the applicant cannot be held liable to have committed the offence. He further submits that the charge sheet in this case has been filed and the applicant is in jail since 21.08.2015, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. 4.
Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail.
5.
I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.
6.
Having regard to the fact that no seizure was made from this applicant and he has been inculpated only on the basis of memorandum of the co-accused and considering the fact that the charge sheet has been filed and the applicant is in jail since 21.08.2015, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. 7.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed.
8.
It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed. 9.
Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Ashok